Please Keep These Pages Free; Check Out Our Sponsors by Clicking the Banner!

Your Advertisement Could Be On This Page!

Your Advertisement Could Be On This Page!



If you appreciate The Nostalgia Pages,
The OTR Digest, The Forums, The Blog,
and our other services, please consider
contributing to their maintenance.


 


Quick-Poll!

OTR attracts people of all ages; how old are you?

< 10 years old
10-19 years old
20-29 years old
30-39 years old
40-49 years old
50-59 years old
60-69 years old
70-79 years old
80+ years old


Channels
Nostalgic Rumblings Blog
The Nostalgia Pages

  Nostalgia

  Mailing Lists

  Book Reviews

  Monthly Columns

    Retro-Views

      June, 2000

      May, 2000

      April, 2000

      March, 2000

      February, 2000

      January, 2000

      December, 1999

      November, 1999

      October, 1999

      September, 1999

      August, 1999

      July, 1999

      June, 1999

      May, 1999

      Apr, 1999

      Mar, 1999

      Feb, 1999

      Jan, 1999

    Radio Moments of Century

    The Curmudgeon

    Struts and Frets

  Charlie's OTR Pages

  FOTR Con Info

  Quick-Poll Vote Results

  Gotham Players

  Bartell on IRC

  Shows Page

  Search Page

  Episode Logs

  The Phorums

  Credits


Proud Affiliate Of


Contact Webmaster


Other Areas

Advertising Rates

L.O.F. Communications


Search


Nostalgia Pages  Web


Page Last
Modified

Tue, Jun 26, 2001
01:00:51 AM EDT

Contents and Source
Material Copyright © 2001,
L.O.F. Communications
All Rights Reserved

 
Retro-Views

Old-Time Radio In Review
by Elizabeth McLeod
February, 1999
 


When you first hear "old time radio," whether you're rediscovering a lost part of your youth or you're discovering a form of entertainment you never knew existed, there's a real sense of excitement. But what happens when the "newness" of OTR wears off. Can these fifty or sixty year old programs really stand up as entertainment?

That's the question I hope to tackle in this monthly column. I'll be considering many different shows, some familiar, some obscure -- but all of them available to modern listeners. I'll try to put the programs into some sort of historical perspective -- and I'll offer my candid opinions on whether they've stood the test of time. You may agree -- or not. Either way, I encourage you to listen for yourself -- and discover the world of Old Time Radio.


"From Out Of Detroit Come The Thundering Hoofbeats...."

Revisiting the WXYZ-Trendle Productions.

I've got to be very careful about what I say this month. I'm talking about a legend.

The Lone Ranger.

The very embodiment of all that is Old Time Radio.

Even if you have only the most passing acquaintance with the aural medium, you know the Ranger. Fiery horse with the speed of light, faithful Indian companion, the whole routine -- capped, of course, with a hearty Hi-Yo Silver. Few radio characters have managed to transcend the medium that gave them life -- the Ranger, indisputably, is one.

Why?

Was "The Lone Ranger" a great artistic achievement, pushing radio to its creative limits with every episode?

Hardly. It was a well-crafted show, its writers and performers always turning in a workmanlike job. But stylistically, the Ranger never rode beyond the techniques of his birthplace: 1930s local radio. The scripts followed a predictable juvenile-adventure format, the acting was a simple, four-square style, the sound effects were never particularly innovative. A Ranger episode from 1948 is virtually identical in construction, in storytelling style, and in production values to an episode from 1938, and even the most avid fan must acknowledge that the Masked Rider of the Plains did little to advance the cause of radio-as-an-art-form. As a result, a modern listener, turning to recordings to try and get a sense of what the show was all about is likely to emerge a bit disappointed.

But there was more to the Ranger than the sum total of his radio adventures. I'm convinced that the real secret to his continuing appeal has less to do with his storylines than it does with the essence of the character himself.

The Lone Ranger was essentially a one-dimensional character -- he fought the bad guys. His origin story explained that he turned to fighting crime as a masked rider to avenge the murder of his brother and his fellow Texas Rangers -- but once Butch Cavendish had been dealt with, the Ranger never seemed to spend much time brooding over the past. There were never any scenes of introspection, never any moments where the Ranger wondered if he was doing the right thing, never any questioning of purpose. He knew he was right and that was it. The world, in the Ranger's view, was a simple place of Good Guys and Bad Guys. And the Good Guys' job was to bring in the Bad Guys. Plain and simple. A kids'-eye view of right and wrong, where there was always a Grown-Up who would solve all the problems and Everything Would Come Out All Right. And for more than twenty years, three nights a week, the Ranger promoted this view, and reinforced this message.

Contrast this philosophy to that of the other major Trendle heroes. The Green Hornet's adventures, for example, were motivated by Britt Reid's distaste for the casual sleaziness of urban life in the 1930s -- a time when it was very difficult to tell the Good Guys from the Bad. As a result the Hornet's fight for justice was quite a bit more complicated than that of his legendary great-uncle -- sometimes taking on a downright anti-establishment tone. The Hornet lived in a relatively complicated world where you couldn't always judge people by the color of their hats. As a result, he was the most *interesting* of the Trendle characters -- but it's doubtful he inspired many kids to daydream about how fun it would be to skulk around in the dark gassing crooked businessmen and corrupt politicians. (Although, now that I think of it, that *would* be kind of fun.)

On the other hand, Sergeant Preston, plain and simple, was a cop. A man with a badge. He didn't need a mask, or a secret identity. He worked for a living -- and his stories were often the Trendle equivalent of a "police procedural." He had dashing adventures in the snow and always gave proper credit to his faithful dog King -- but he seemed to lack the independent motivations of his fellow Trendle heroes. He was doing his job -- and unlike the Ranger or the Hornet, he could at least look forward to collecting a pension some day.

But the Ranger was different. To the generation that grew up on his adventures, he was something special. An icon.

The Lone Ranger was, in the purest sense, a Hero. He Did The Right Thing Because It *Was* The Right Thing. That was all the motive he needed. Kids bought that in the thirties, the forties, and the fifties -- and as cynical as we may have come to be as grownups in the nineties, deep inside we still want to believe that such a Hero can exist. And that Everything Will Turn Out All Right in the end.

The formulaic scripts, the stiff acting, and the outdated productions don't matter.

As long as there's a need for Heroes, the Lone Ranger Will Ride Again.


Elizabeth McLeod is a journalist, researcher, and freelance writer specializing in radio of the 1930s. She is a regular contributor to "Nostalgia Digest" magazine and the Internet OTR Digest Mailing List, maintains a website, Broadcasting History Resources, and is presently researching a book on Depression-era broadcasting. Elizabeth is always looking for 1930s radio recordings in all formats -- uncoated aluminum or lacquer-coated discs, vinyl or shellac pressings, or low-generation tape copies. You can contact her at lizmcl@midcoast.com